Considering user response options

I see that we have some defaults in place, like approvals on failure and network enabled. I want to create a brief yet informative response.

I’ll start with a one-line translation. Then I'll ask what they’d prefer: a summary from sources, a timeline of Messi-Barça since 2021, or an impact interpretation. I can offer to check open sources and share citations if they’d like, and I’ll clarify that some terms mean the stadium is under renovation.

I want to avoid any speculation while verifying the original Spanish report!Crafting user response options

I’m planning my response. First, I'll provide a translation. Next, I want to ask what the user is most interested in: verifying and summarizing key points with sources, providing background context, or outlining potential reasons.

If they choose the first option, I'll conduct a web search to find the necessary information. I see there are special requests related to showing time, but that doesn’t apply here, so I’ll just focus on asking them. Let’s put this together!

要我帮你做什么呢？

• 我可以翻译/改写这条消息，或给出简短解读。
• 也可以检索原始西媒报道，核实细节并汇总要点与来源链接。
• 或者整理梅西与巴萨近况/关系背景、诺坎普目前的施工与访问流程等上下文。

先给你一句话译文参考： “西媒称：梅西造访诺坎普前未提前联系巴萨，但俱乐部显然知情。”